Case 2203612/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Bouamar v Landmark Group (UK) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203612/2021
- Decision date
- 27 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Bouamar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Regional Employment Judge Wade therefore dealt with the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 on the basis of the ET1 and decided that a determination could properly be made without a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant holiday pay and notice pay. The judgment does not set out any further factual findings or dispute between the parties, and it does not break the award into separate heads of loss for each element.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Ms S Bouamar £5,500 gross and to account to HMRC for the tax and National Insurance due. No separate remedy components were identified in the judgment beyond that total sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment does not break down the £5,500 between holiday pay and notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not break down the £5,500 between holiday pay and notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.