Case 2203627/2020 · Employment Tribunal
MR FIRAS RAJABDEEN & ORS v Company M Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203627/2020
- Decision date
- 25 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR FIRAS RAJABDEEN & ORS
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants brought a complaint under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. At the remote hearing on 25 March 2021, before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone, the respondent was not present or represented. The tribunal found the complaint well founded and held that the respondent had failed to comply with the section 188 consultation requirements.
The tribunal ordered remuneration by way of protective award to each affected employee listed in the judgment. The protected period began on 19 March 2020 and was fixed at 90 days. The judgment sets out individual awards for 19 employees, totalling £104,342.51.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under section 188 TULRCA 1992. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to comply with the consultation requirements and made protective-award payments to each affected employee for a 90-day protected period beginning on 19 March 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £104,343
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.190 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.