Case 2203634/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Sadirir v Kadiem Group Limited and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 2203634/2021
- Decision date
- 5 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr J Sadirir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondents did not file an ET3. Employment Judge E Burns therefore determined the case on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The claims against the second and third respondents were dismissed.
As against the first respondent, the tribunal found that the claimant had been unlawfully failed paid wages of £5,000 gross, holiday pay of £807.69 gross, and £5,000 gross in respect of notice. The judgment records those sums as the amounts due to the claimant.
The first respondent was ordered to pay £10,807.69 gross in total, less deductions required for tax and national insurance contributions, and to account to HMRC for any such deductions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £808 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this sum as being 'in respect of notice'. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,808
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.