Case 2203684/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Richmond Park Partners LLP — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203684/2019
- Decision date
- 16 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file ET3 grounds of resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade therefore considered the ET1 and determined the claim without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment records that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant notice pay, redundancy, expenses and holiday pay. The tribunal ordered payment of £9,106 for unpaid notice pay and £40 for expenses, £6,300 for redundancy pay, and £1,244.66 for accrued holiday pay.
The tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to award further compensation for stress or inconvenience. The hearing listed for 14 February did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Award covered unpaid notice pay of £9,106 and expenses of £40. | Upheld | — | £9,146 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,300 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay was awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,245 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,691
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.