Case 2203720/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Properties of the World Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203720/2019
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file ET3 grounds of resistance. Under rule 21, Employment Judge JL Wade decided the claim could properly be determined without a hearing, and the listed hearing on 6 March 2020 did not take place.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages and notice pay to the claimant, Ms N Shutler. It ordered payment of wages of £2,166.00 gross and notice pay of £499.85, with deductions for tax and National Insurance to be made from the notice pay element.
The judgment recorded that the claimant did not have two complete years’ service and so was entitled to one week’s notice pay. No other remedies or awards were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages and ordered payment of £2,166.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,166 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the respondent had failed to pay notice pay. It recorded that the claimant did not have two complete years' service and was therefore entitled to one week’s notice pay. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,666
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.