Case 2203725/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Nawaz v DWF Claims Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203725/2021
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson Date
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms B Nawaz
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote hearing on 11 January 2022, Employment Judge Isaacson Date dealt with limitation issues only. The claimant's ordinary unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because it had been presented out of time, and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have presented the claim within the primary limitation period.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's indirect discrimination claim, direct discrimination claim, and equal pay claim under the Equality Act 2010 were presented out of time, but it was just and equitable to extend time to allow those claims to proceed. This written record contains no merits findings or remedy award, and it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claim was presented out of time and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have presented it within the primary limitation period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Indirect discrimination claim under the Equality Act 2010 was presented out of time, but the tribunal extended time on a just and equitable basis so the claim could proceed. The judgment does not identify the protected characteristic or decide the merits. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Direct discrimination claim under the Equality Act 2010 was presented out of time, but the tribunal extended time on a just and equitable basis so the claim could proceed. The judgment does not identify the protected characteristic or decide the merits. | Other | — | — |
| Equal pay | Equal pay claim under the Equality Act 2010 was presented out of time, but the tribunal extended time on a just and equitable basis so the claim could proceed. No merits decision or remedy was recorded in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable to have presented the claim within the primary limitation period
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.