Case 2203734/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G A Baryar v Masterclean Drycleaner Service Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203734/2020
- Decision date
- 19 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G A Baryar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Adkin on 18 February 2021, dealt with two monetary claims brought by Mr G A Baryar against Masterclean Drycleaner Service Limited. The claim for unpaid notice pay failed and was dismissed.
The claimant succeeded on his claim for unpaid and untaken annual leave at the date of termination under regulations 13, 13A and 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal found that 32 days were due at a daily rate of £45.51.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,456.33. The parties had both declined written reasons at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for unpaid notice pay fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for unpaid and untaken annual leave at termination pursuant to regulations 13, 13A and 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeds, for 32 days at a daily rate of £45.51. | Upheld | — | £1,456 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,456
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.