Case 2203738/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Therapie Medical (UK) Ltd (formerly known as Therapie Glasgow Ltd) (Company number 10181501) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203738/2021
- Decision date
- 20 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3. The tribunal therefore determined the claim under Rule 21 on the papers, using the ET1 and the extracted judgment text. The claimant had been employed from 13 February 2019 to 24 April 2021 and had resigned on 10 April 2021.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay for reduced-hours work, 90 hours of holiday pay, and additional costs caused by delay in payment. It ordered gross payments of £106 for 4 hours of unpaid reduced-hours work, £1,000 for additional costs, and £2,385 for holiday pay, making a total award of £3,491 gross subject to deductions for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded £106 for 4 hours of unpaid reduced-hours work and £1,000 for additional costs arising from delay in payment. | Upheld | — | £1,106 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded £2,385 for 90 hours of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,491
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.