Case 2203740/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. V. Hills v 1989 Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203740/2022
- Decision date
- 26 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Galbraith-Marten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. V. Hills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs V Hills brought a wages claim against 1989 Group Limited. The case was heard at London Central by CVP on 26 August 2022 before Employment Judge J Galbraith-Marten sitting alone, and the respondent did not attend.
The judgment was made pursuant to Rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,107.69, subject to such deductions as were required for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment made pursuant to Rule 21. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,107.69, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,108 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,108
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.