Case 2203746/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Urquhart, ELIPS For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203746/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms C Urquhart, ELIPS For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing before Employment Judge Norris sitting alone at Central London on 19 December 2019 concerned preliminary jurisdictional issues only. The claimant's age discrimination complaint was dismissed on withdrawal, so the tribunal did not determine that claim on its merits.
The tribunal held that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, arrears of pay and holiday pay had been presented out of time. It accordingly struck out those complaints because it did not have jurisdiction to hear them.
The listed three-day hearing fixed for 28 to 30 April 2020 was vacated. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's age discrimination complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Presented out of time and struck out because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to arrears of pay; that complaint was presented out of time and struck out for lack of jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Presented out of time and struck out because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.