Case 2203778/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Magennis (Direct Access Barrister) For the v ISS Facility Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2203778/2019
- Decision date
- 1 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Palca Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Magennis (Direct Access Barrister) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant was employed by the Respondent as a cleaner from 1 February 2019. He claimed unpaid wages and compensation for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment. The Respondent did not attend the hearing but provided written material; where its evidence conflicted with the Claimant's sworn evidence, the tribunal preferred the Claimant's evidence.
The tribunal found that the Claimant had signed a document headed Statement of Particulars of Employment but was not given a copy of it or the handbook referred to in it. It also found that he was not given a statement of changes when the minimum wage increased on 1 April 2019.
On the wage claim, the tribunal accepted the Claimant's evidence that he was due £5,315.53 for the period 1 February 2019 to 11 October 2019 and had received £4,631.53, leaving £683.90 unlawfully deducted. Because the Claimant had succeeded in an unlawful deductions claim and the Respondent had not complied with ss1 and 4 Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal considered it just and equitable to award four weeks' pay of £431 under s38 Employment Act 2002, making a total award of £1,114.90.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages totaling £683.90 and ordered payment of that sum. | Upheld | — | £684 |
| Other | The tribunal awarded four weeks' pay under s38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment and statement of material changes under ss1 and 4 Employment Rights Act 1996. Classified as other because the locked taxonomy has no specific category for written particulars awards. | Upheld | — | £431 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,115
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- ss1 and 4 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s38 Employment Act 2002
- s224 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.