Case 2203782/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr R Morgan (Director) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2203782/2023
- Decision date
- 16 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 October 2023, at London Central, Employment Judge Glennie heard the claim brought by Miss A Coleman against Central London Inns Limited t/a The Lyric Pub Soho. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr R Morgan, the director.
The judgment records a single outcome: the claim was struck out because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. No further reasoning, findings of fact, or substantive determination of the pleaded issues are set out in the extracted written record.
The written record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No financial award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment records only that the claim was struck out because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. The underlying pleaded claims are not specified in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.