Case 2203786/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Cover Up Clothing Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2203786/2021
- Decision date
- 25 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms Keating, Ms Marsters
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at London Central Employment Tribunal on 24 and 25 July 2023 before Employment Judge Webster, sitting with Ms Keating and Ms Marsters. The claimant, Ms Rehana Khan, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal, her claim for automatically unfair dismissal pursuant to s103A ERA, and her claim for detriment pursuant to s47B ERA. The judgment text records those outcomes without setting out additional reasoning beyond the findings themselves.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £8,070, calculated as £538 multiplied by 15. It also made a compensatory award of £19,509.31, made up of £5,818.68 for notice pay and £13,690.63 for loss of earnings between 12 April 2021 and 1 September 2022, derived from £34,912.08 less £21,221.45.
An injury to feelings award of £3,000 was also made, and the total payable was £30,579.31. The judgment text does not separately attribute the monetary awards to each upheld claim, so the claim-level remedy amounts are not split out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal. The judgment text does not split the monetary awards between this claim and the whistleblowing findings. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for automatically unfair dismissal pursuant to s103A ERA. The judgment text does not split the monetary awards between this claim and the other upheld claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for detriment pursuant to s47B ERA. The judgment text does not split the monetary awards between this claim and the other upheld claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £30,579
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £8,070
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £19,509
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s103A ERA 1996
- s47B ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.