Case 2203799/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Grijuela v Orsa Projects Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2203799/2022
- Decision date
- 2 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Grijuela
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London Central via CVP on 29-30 November 2022 before Employment Judge A M Snelson, held that Mrs S Grijuela's complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded. The judgment records that finding as the substantive outcome of the hearing.
It also recorded that the claimant's other claims, not having been pursued, were dismissed. The case listing identified breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages among the proceedings, but the extracted judgment text does not separately set out any further findings on those claims.
No remedy was determined in this judgment. The tribunal directed that a separate hearing to determine outstanding remedy issues would be held on 2 March 2023, and it recorded that no reduction was to be applied to any compensatory award on Polkey grounds and no reduction was to be applied on account of the claimant's conduct.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's other claims, not having been pursued, were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's other claims, not having been pursued, were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey grounds
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.