Case 2203818/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Otigba v Sporadic Consulting Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203818/2022
- Decision date
- 5 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Otigba
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Khan, sitting alone, found that Sporadic Consulting Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Miss M Otigba’s wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states that the deductions totalled £593.44 gross.
The award was broken down as £445.08 in unpaid wages and £148.36 in accrued holiday pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £593.44 to the claimant and recorded that the respondent should account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due.
No other claims, remedies, or legal tests are identified in the written record provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The award comprised £445.08 in unpaid wages and £148.36 in accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £593 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £593
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.