Case 2203848/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Reynolds v Nowy Styl UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203848/2019
- Decision date
- 9 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Reynolds
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The Employment Tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr A Reynolds, against Nowy Styl UK Ltd.
The extracted judgment text does not contain any substantive findings on the merits, any liability decision, or any remedy assessment. It therefore records a procedural disposal only, rather than an adjudication on the underlying employment claims.
The case listing categories supplied with the judgment identify breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages as the listed issues, but the PDF text itself does not break those issues down further or attribute any separate outcome to each head of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted PDF text does not specify the underlying pleaded issues, but the case listing categories include breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted PDF text does not allocate separate outcomes to individual heads of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.