Case 2203852/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203852/2019
- Decision date
- 6 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London Central on 1 and 6 April 2021 before Employment Judge Glennie. The claimant was represented by herself and the respondents by counsel, Mr N Clarke.
The complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed. The complaint of breach of contract, identified in the judgment as wrongful dismissal, was found well founded.
The respondents were ordered to pay the claimant £1,638.76 net as compensation, and the total sum payable was recorded as £1,638.76. The respondents’ counterclaim was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Judgment described the breach of contract complaint as wrongful dismissal and awarded compensation of £1,638.76 net. | Upheld | — | £1,639 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,639
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.