Case 2203864/2022 · Employment Tribunal
CR v Ravenscroft Park Preparatory School and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203864/2022
- Decision date
- 30 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Galbraith-Marten
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
4 namedClaimant
CR
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in London Central on 1 June 2023, Employment Judge J Galbraith-Marten sat alone and dealt with procedural applications in CR's case against Ravenscroft Park Preparatory School, Lucy Bennison and Gardener Schools Groups Limited. The tribunal accepted the claimant's application dated 30 November 2022 to amend the claim so as to include a victimisation complaint.
The record does not contain any merits determination of that victimisation complaint. The claimant's separate application for an anonymity order was refused.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The claimant's application dated 30 November 2022 to amend the claim to include a victimisation complaint was accepted. The record does not include any merits determination of that complaint. | Other | — | — |
| Other | The claimant's application for an anonymity order was refused at the preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.