Case 2203865/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Derveni v Education Dreams Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203865/2022
- Decision date
- 13 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Case Number
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Derveni
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs L Derveni brought a claim against Education Dreams Ltd for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to arrears of pay. The hearing took place remotely at London Central on 13 September 2022 before Tribunal Judge Plowright sitting alone. The respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found that the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was well founded and succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £768.71. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and National Insurance due on that sum.
The written record does not contain fuller reasons beyond the short finding and remedy order, because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant succeeded on a claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to arrears of pay. The respondent did not attend. The written record does not set out detailed reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were requested. | Upheld | — | £769 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £769
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.