Case 2203869/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person, assisted by Mr S Lwetutte (Mackenzie Friend) v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2203869/2022
- Decision date
- 24 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms Z Darmas, Mr K Ghotbi-Ravandi
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person, assisted by Mr S Lwetutte (Mackenzie Friend)
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously dismissed the claimant's complaints of detriment for making a protected disclosure, constructive unfair dismissal under sections 103A and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, direct discrimination because of age, and victimisation. The judgment records dismissal of each complaint in a single dispositive paragraph.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriment for making a protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal pleaded under sections 103A and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct discrimination because of age. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim dismissed; the dispositive paragraph does not set out any separate remedy or reasoning. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.