Case 2203892/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Wilson v Elle Beauty Limited t/a Elevatione Time Stops London Heard via Cloud Video Platform (London Central) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2203892/2022
- Decision date
- 22 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson
- Panel members
- Dr V Weerasinghe, Ms H Craik
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Wilson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP on 20, 21 and 22 June 2023 before Employment Judge Davidson, sitting with Dr V Weerasinghe and Ms H Craik. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a litigation consultant. The published judgment records that the claimant's direct race discrimination claim failed and was dismissed.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £382. The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days, so the published decision records the outcome and remedy but does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £382 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £382
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.