Case 2203895/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Fintricity Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203895/2019
- Decision date
- 20 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file ET3 grounds of resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade therefore determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing. On the ET1 and the material before the tribunal, the tribunal found that Fintricity Solutions Limited had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages and notice pay.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £8,495.52 in wages and £1,415.92 in notice pay, and to account to HMRC for any payments due. The listed hearing on 21 February 2020 did not proceed because judgment had already been given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment made without a hearing after the respondent failed to file ET3 grounds of resistance. The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages and notice pay. The award was £8,495.52 wages plus £1,415.92 notice pay. | Upheld | — | £9,911 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,911
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.