Case 2203909/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C McGivan v Remedy Payroll Solutions Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203909/2022
- Decision date
- 18 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C McGivan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms C McGivan, brought a claim against Remedy Payroll Solutions Ltd for unlawful deduction from wages. The respondent did not file an ET3 grounds of resistance, and the tribunal determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
On the ET1 and material before it, Regional Employment Judge Wade found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant. The judgment records that unpaid wages of £2,400 gross were due and awards that sum to the claimant.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on the award. No other remedy components are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent did not file an ET3 and the tribunal determined the claim without a hearing on the ET1. | Upheld | — | £2,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.