Case 2203913/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrea Longoni v Ven Vidi Limited (formerly La Fenice Marylebone Ltd) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203913/2022
- Decision date
- 27 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Andrea Longoni
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was for unlawful deduction from wages. The Respondent did not file an ET3 or Grounds of Resistance, so Employment Judge Adkin determined the matter on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Having considered the ET1, payslip and bank statement supplied by Mr Andrea Longoni, the tribunal found that the Respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages in the sum of £3,382.74. The claim therefore succeeded.
The tribunal ordered Ven Vidi Limited (formerly La Fenice Marylebone Ltd) to pay £3,382.74, subject to any deductions for sums paid to HMRC for tax and national insurance due on that amount. The listed hearing on 1 November 2022 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The Respondent did not file an ET3 or Grounds of Resistance. The tribunal determined the claim on the ET1, payslip and bank statement. The sum was ordered subject to any deductions for sums paid to HMRC for tax and national insurance due on it. | Upheld | — | £3,383 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,383
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.