Case 2203968/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Represented herself For the v Colonnade (Operator) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203968/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Represented herself For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to Colonnade (Operator) Ltd. The respondent did not attend the hearing, and the claimant represented herself.
The tribunal upheld the claim for 20 days' holiday pay and awarded £1,530 gross, calculated as 20 days at 8.5 hours per day at £9 per hour. It also upheld the claim for unpaid wages and awarded £4,445.29 gross, comprising £2,271.79 on the May payslip and £2,173.50 for 21 days worked between 25 May 2019 and 14 June 2019 at 11.5 hours per day and £9 per hour.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or within 14 days of the written decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld a claim for 20 days' holiday pay and awarded £1,530 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,530 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described this as a claim for unpaid wages and awarded £4,445.29 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,445 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,975
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.