Case 2203969/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Prof A Bogg, Counsel For the v Twenty 1 Construction Ltd (In Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2203969/2022
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Representations
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Prof A Bogg, Counsel For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal was satisfied, for reasons given orally, that the complaints were made out. It found that Twenty 1 Construction Limited (In Administration) failed to comply with the requirements of sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Having considered correspondence from the administrators consenting to the claims, a letter from an RPS Tribunal Officer, and submissions from counsel for the claimants, the Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay each listed claimant 90 days' pay from a commencement date of 21 March 2022. The judgment does not state a total monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment states that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 and section 188A TULRCA and orders 90 days' pay for each listed claimant. No individual monetary figure is provided. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 TULRCA
- section 188A TULRCA
- section 189(4) TULRCA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.