Mr D Phelps v Travelex Limited — 2022

Case reference: 2204083/2020
Decision date: 18 November 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hyams

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr D Phelps

Respondent

Travelex Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that by letter dated 21 September 2022 it had given Mr D Phelps an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.

On that basis, Employment Judge Hyams ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not set out any merits findings on the underlying substantive claims and does not record any remedy or award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify any individual substantive causes of action. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing following the tribunal's letter of 21 September 2022.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.