Case 2204153/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Represented himself v Maize Blaze Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2204153/2023
- Decision date
- 14 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heydon Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Represented himself
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Harun Rashid, presented a claim against Maize Blaze Ltd for unauthorised deduction from wages. The hearing took place at London Central via CVP on 13 June 2023 before Employment Judge Heydon, with the respondent not present.
The tribunal found that the claimant's complaint was well-founded. It held that the respondent unlawfully deducted £1,468.12 from the claimant's wages.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No further findings, tests, or separate remedy components are set out in the written judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded and held that the respondent unlawfully deducted £1,468.12. | Upheld | — | £1,468 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,468
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,468
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.