Case 2204175/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Doyle v Goldman Sachs International & others — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204175/2021
- Decision date
- 21 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms S Campbell, Mr D Clay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Doyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in London Central on 17-21 October 2022 before Employment Judge A M Snelson, with Ms S Campbell and Mr D Clay as members. The parties were represented by counsel for both sides. The judgment states that, by consent, terms of settlement were agreed at the hearing.
The tribunal's order was that all claims were dismissed on withdrawal. No substantive findings of fact or liability were made in the judgment, and no remedy was awarded. The text does not record any legal tests applied or any split between individual claims and remedies.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that terms of settlement were agreed at the hearing and that all claims were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that terms of settlement were agreed at the hearing and that all claims were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that terms of settlement were agreed at the hearing and that all claims were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.