Case 2204175/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v NU Projects Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204175/2022
- Decision date
- 12 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay for the period 1 January 2022 to 29 April 2022 was well founded. The respondent did not appear and was not represented at the hearing before Employment Judge B Beyzade at London Central, held by CVP on 12 September 2022.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £459.76. The judgment records that tax and national insurance are to be deducted from that sum if the respondent intimates any such deductions in writing and remits the deducted amount to HMRC.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint was of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay between 1 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. The tribunal ordered payment of £459.76, subject to tax and national insurance being deducted if the respondent intimated any such deductions in writing and remitted them to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £460 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £460
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.