Case 2204183/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Brentham Club Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2204183/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBrentham Club Ltd did not file ET3 grounds of resistance. Mr J Kinder wrote on 9 November 2019 to say the tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the claimant did not have two years' service, but Employment Judge JL Wade held that the tribunal did have jurisdiction over the claims before it and that the case could properly be determined on the papers under rule 21 without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay Ms S Saggers wages and holiday pay. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,110.79 gross wages and £119.78 gross accrued holiday pay, and to account to HMRC for any payments due. The judgment also records that the hearing listed for 12 December 2019 would not take place because judgment had been given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal held the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages and holiday pay, and ordered payment of £1,110.79 gross wages plus £119.78 gross accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,231 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,231
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.