Case 2204203/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Ms. Tweedale (HR Business Partner) Interpreter: Ms. Moussa — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204203/2020
- Decision date
- 27 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claimant's unpaid wages / unlawful deductions claim at London Central by video on 22 October 2020, before Employment Judge P Klimov. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Tweedale, HR Business Partner, with an interpreter present.
The tribunal's judgment was brief and direct: it found that the respondent did not make unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages. On that basis, the claimant's claim for unpaid wages failed.
The claim was dismissed in full. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the respondent did not make unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages. It also recorded that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.