Case 2204247/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Pridegreen Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204247/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Pridegreen Limited, did not file ET3 grounds of resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade therefore determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant, Mr F Alram. It ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £2,500.
The tribunal stated that it did not have jurisdiction to award compensation for stress or for time spent asking for payment. The hearing listed for 6 February 2020 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent did not file ET3 grounds of resistance, and the tribunal determined the claim without a hearing. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,500
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.