Case 2204304/2021 · Employment Tribunal
William Raymond Milton v Balfour Beatty Group Employment Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204304/2021
- Decision date
- 2 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
William Raymond Milton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case at London Central by video on 1 and 2 March 2022, before Tribunal Judge Dr A Jack acting as an Employment Judge. The claimant was represented by Mr R Harwood, lay representative, and the respondent by Mr A Mathur, counsel.
The written judgment records that the claim for unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. It also records that the claim for wrongful dismissal failed and was dismissed. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim for unfair dismissal fails and is dismissed; oral reasons were given but no written reasons are included in the supplied text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment records that the claim for wrongful dismissal fails and is dismissed; oral reasons were given but no written reasons are included in the supplied text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.