Case 2204314/2021 · Employment Tribunal
A Pashev v Stuart Delivery Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2204314/2021
- Decision date
- 8 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Pashev
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent told the tribunal it had been unable to contact the claimant and that he had not answered correspondence. It understood that ACAS and the claimant's former representatives had also been unable to contact him.
The tribunal wrote to the claimant explaining that the judge was considering striking out the claim on the basis that it had not been actively pursued, and ordered him to write by 24 February 2023 if he still wished to continue. The claimant did not respond.
The tribunal therefore found that the claimant was not actively pursuing the claim and struck it out in its entirety under Rule 37(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reasons do not restate the substantive pleaded claim, but the case listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages; the claim was struck out in full because it was not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.