Case 2204318/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Hylton v Dr Martens Airwair — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204318/2020
- Decision date
- 25 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wisby JUDGMENT
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Hylton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe employment tribunal at London Central, before Employment Judge Wisby, recorded that the claimant, Mr J Hylton, had complaints under case numbers 2204318/2020 and 2204757/2020. The judgment does not identify the substantive nature of those complaints in the extracted text provided.
The sole operative decision is that the complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal. No findings of fact, liability analysis, legal test, or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted judgment text. There is no award of compensation or other monetary remedy recorded.
Because the judgment is limited to the procedural disposal on withdrawal, the public record should reflect only that the claims were withdrawn and dismissed, without inferring the underlying heads of claim or any merits outcome.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the complaints raised under claim numbers 2204318/2020 and 2204757/2020 were dismissed upon withdrawal. It does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.