Case 2204328/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Pawlus v Agnieszka Rennick and Darren Rennick — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204328/2021
- Decision date
- 29 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Pawlus
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Khan, sitting alone at London Central on 29 October 2021, found that the respondents breached the claimant's right to compensation related to entitlement for leave under regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The judgment does not record any separate findings on liability for other causes of action.
The tribunal ordered the respondents to pay the claimant the gross sum of £324. The judgment states that this amount was compensation for 3 days' leave accrued on termination. No separate breakdown of the award into basic award, compensatory award, interest, or other heads of loss is given in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment records a finding that the respondents breached the claimant's right to compensation related to entitlement for leave under regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It then orders payment of the gross sum of £324, described as compensation for 3 days' leave accrued on termination. | Upheld | — | £324 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £324
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.