Case 2204334/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Yemane v Facilicom Cleaning Services Ltd and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204334/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms A Yemane
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claim against Marchmont Surveyors Limited because it was not the correct respondent to the proceedings. The judgment does not record any findings on the substantive merits of the underlying complaints against that respondent.
The claims against Facilicom Cleaning Services Ltd and Simon David Cleaning Services Ltd were dismissed on withdrawal after terms of settlement had been reached. The judgment records no award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim against Marchmont Surveyors Limited was dismissed because the tribunal found it was not the correct respondent to these proceedings. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claims against Facilicom Cleaning Services Ltd and Simon David Cleaning Services Ltd were dismissed on withdrawal after terms of settlement had been reached. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.