Case 2204345/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Persaud v SOAS, University of London OPEN PRELIMINARY HEARINGBY CVP VIDEO — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204345/2021
- Decision date
- 30 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms I Persaud
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone at London Central on 30 March 2022. The claimant was Ms I Persaud and the respondent was SOAS, University of London. The judgment records that the claim was dismissed because it was out of time.
The tribunal also found that it was not just and equitable in all the circumstances to extend time. No findings on the substantive merits of the underlying discrimination allegations are recorded in the judgment text provided, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Dismissed at an open preliminary hearing because the claim was out of time and it was not just and equitable in all the circumstances to extend time. The judgment does not record any merits findings on the age discrimination allegation. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed at an open preliminary hearing because the claim was out of time and it was not just and equitable in all the circumstances to extend time. The judgment does not record any merits findings on the race discrimination allegation. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.