Case 2204438/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Simya Canteen Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204438/2020
- Decision date
- 20 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to file ET3 grounds of resistance. The tribunal considered the ET1 and decided the claim could properly be determined without a hearing. It found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay unpaid wages of £1,650.60 to the claimant and to account to HMRC for tax and National Insurance as necessary. The listed hearing for 23 October 2020 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
The judgment also records that the claimant said he had been dismissed and wished to bring a further claim for unpaid wages. The tribunal said that any such claim would need to be made in a fresh claim and that the claimant should be mindful of the tribunal time limits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,651 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,651
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.