Case 2204439/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D. Curwen (of Counsel) For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204439/2020
- Decision date
- 14 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D. Curwen (of Counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr S Hussain was unfairly dismissed by Trenitalia c2c Limited. Judgment was given orally at the hearing before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone on 13 and 14 May 2021.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £28,767.69 by 25 June 2021. That sum comprised a basic award of £5,022.93 and a compensatory award of £23,744.76, with the compensatory award described as capped under s.124(1) Employment Rights Act 1996. The extracted text records that written reasons were requested by the respondent and would be provided in due course.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded total compensation of £28,767.69, made up of a basic award of £5,022.93 and a compensatory award of £23,744.76. The compensatory award was stated to be capped under s.124(1) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £28,768 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £28,768
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,023
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £23,745
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.