Case 2204453/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Belgravia Mews Hotel Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204453/2019
- Decision date
- 10 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent did not file ET3 grounds of resistance. The tribunal therefore determined the claim on the papers without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant. It ordered the respondent to pay £706 in wages and to account to HMRC for tax and national insurance as necessary.
The tribunal also stated that it did not have jurisdiction to award compensation for “running around and chasing”. The hearing listed for 9 April 2020 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not file ET3 grounds of resistance. The tribunal determined the claim without a hearing and found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £706 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £706
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.