Case 2204460/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Laxmi Karki v Jamie Yike — 2023
- Case reference
- 2204460/2022
- Decision date
- 2 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Laxmi Karki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 or grounds of resistance. Employment Judge E Burns therefore determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing, after considering the ET1.
The tribunal held that the claim was in time because the claimant would have expected to be paid her last wages by the end of February 2022. On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant.
The claimant had calculated the net sum owed as £875.00, and the tribunal accepted that figure. The respondent was ordered to pay such sum as is required to ensure that the claimant receives £875.00 net.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £875 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £875
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.