Case 2204495/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Mascitti v Food Designers Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204495/2021
- Decision date
- 23 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Julia Smailes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Mascitti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs R Mascitti brought claims against Food Designers Ltd for a redundancy payment and for unlawful deductions from wages. The case was heard remotely at London Central on 23 September 2021 before Employment Judge Julia Smailes, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by an HR consultant.
The tribunal dismissed both claims. It found that the claim for a redundancy payment was not well founded and dismissed it. It also found that the claim that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's pay was not well founded and dismissed it.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claim for a redundancy payment was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim for unlawful deductions from pay was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.