Case 2204504/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Mazepa v Mr R St John Murphy and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2204504/2021
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe
- Panel members
- Ms O Stennett, Mr R Miller
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs E Mazepa
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remedy hearing on 9 March 2023 at London Central, before Employment Judge Joffe sitting with Ms O Stennett and Mr R Miller, the tribunal made monetary awards following the claimant's successful claims against Mr R St John Murphy and Alportel Limited. The claimant appeared in person and the first respondent appeared in person. The extracted text records that reasons were given orally, and no written reasons are included.
For unfair dismissal, the claimant was awarded a basic award of £4,896 and compensation of £18,615.84. The compensatory award was broken down into £15,875.84 for past loss of earnings, £400 for loss of statutory rights, and £2,340 for loss of pension payments. For wrongful dismissal, the tribunal awarded £6,318.10.
The tribunal also awarded £10,769.51 for pay for accrued but untaken annual leave. For unlawful deductions from wages, it awarded £38,006.97, made up of £7,417.29 for unpaid maternity pay and £30,589.68 for unpaid salary. The total sum awarded under all heads was £78,606.42, payable by the first respondent.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The remedy judgment awarded a basic award of £4,896 and compensatory compensation of £18,615.84 for this claim. | Upheld | — | £23,512 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,318 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for pay for accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £10,770 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprised £7,417.29 for unpaid maternity pay and £30,589.68 for unpaid salary. | Upheld | — | £38,007 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £78,606
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,896
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £18,616
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.