Case 2204548/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Evans v Ganapati Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204548/2021
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to the claim was presented. Applying Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, Employment Judge Baty recorded that the claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and accrued holiday pay succeeded.
The tribunal awarded £19,493.08 gross in total. That sum comprised £14,550 gross for unpaid wages from 8 January to 30 June 2021 and £4,943.08 gross for 42 days' accrued but untaken holiday. The hearing listed for 7 October 2021 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages succeeded and awarded £14,550 gross for unpaid wages from 8 January to 30 June 2021. | Upheld | — | £14,550 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal stated that the claimant's complaint in respect of accrued holiday pay succeeded and awarded £4,943.08 gross for 42 days accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £4,943 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,493
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.