Case 2204573/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Satterthwaite v British Broadcasting Corporation — 2022
- Case reference
- 2204573/2022
- Decision date
- 22 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Satterthwaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal had written to the Claimant on 23 November 2022 seeking comments on the Respondent's strike-out application by 29 November 2022, but no reply was received. It wrote again on 8 December 2022 stating that Employment Judge Glennie was considering striking out the claim and inviting representations or a hearing request by 15 December 2022. No reply was received, and the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued and does not address the merits of any unfair dismissal allegation. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued and does not address the merits of any disability discrimination allegation. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.