Case 2204574/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Kimberley Johnson v Beauty Consultants Bureau (UK) LLP — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204574/2020
- Decision date
- 17 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kimberley Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 grounds of resistance. Regional Employment Judge Wade therefore considered the ET1 and made a determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 without a hearing. The listed hearing for 27 September 2021 to 1 October 2021 was cancelled and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment ordered in the default judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,725 |
| Other | Award described as notice pay; the judgment does not specify the underlying legal label. | Upheld | — | £4,725 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay for 1 March 2020 to 30 March 2020. | Upheld | — | £2,310 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,760
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.