Case 2204576/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Azzara Gibson v Beauty Consultants Bureau (UK) LLP — 2021
- Case reference
- 2204576/2020
- Decision date
- 17 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Azzara Gibson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge Wade therefore determined the claim on the ET1 alone under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, without a hearing. The listed hearing for 27 September 2021 to 1 October 2021 was cancelled and the parties were told not to attend.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay monies owed to the claimant. It ordered the respondent to pay £9,660.00, made up of a statutory redundancy payment of £3,675.00, notice pay of £3,675.00, and arrears of pay from 1 March 2020 to 30 March 2020 of £2,310.00.
The judgment also required the respondent to account to HMRC for the tax and national insurance due on the amount awarded. No discrimination issues, panel members, or further legal tests were recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded in the Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,675 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded as a separate head of payment; the judgment does not label it with a fuller cause of action. | Upheld | — | £3,675 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay for 1 March 2020 to 30 March 2020. | Upheld | — | £2,310 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,660
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.