Case 2204580/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mr E Mostaqye — 2020
- Case reference
- 2204580/2019
- Decision date
- 21 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Emad Mostaqye did not file ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade therefore determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages and pension contributions. It ordered payment of £1,031.45 in wages and £376.16 in NEST pension payments, and directed that the respondent account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due.
The tribunal also made a preparation time order against the respondent in the sum of £200. The hearing listed for 24 February 2020 did not take place because judgment had been given.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of wages of £1,031.45. | Upheld | — | £1,031 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered NEST pension payments of £376.16 and required the respondent to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due. | Upheld | — | £376 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,608
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.